EIN online Extraordinary General Assembly

EIN Extraordinary General Assembly took place online on Friday 18th December 2020. It was facilitated by the Chair of EIN, Başak Çalı.

The topics covered during the assembly were as follows:

-        the Chair of EIN, Başak Çalı, provided introductions and welcoming remarks. 

-        Explanation and vote on the Proposal of the Board to postpone the General Assembly to summer 2021, latest end of 2021

-        EIN also welcomed new members to the network since the last General Assembly, which included:

o   ACCEPT Association

o   International Commission of Jurists

o   Open Society Fund Prague

o   Validity

o   GYLA

o   CILD

o   Human Rights House Zagreb

o   Human Rights Monitoring Institute

o   Association for the Protection of Constitutionality and Legality (UZUZ)

o   Promo-LEX

o   Anne-Katrin Speck

o   Ramute Remezaite

-        Information about changes in EIN Governance

-        Initial consideration of the follow-up to the EIN External Evaluation

-        Başak Çalı provided the concluding remarks.

We thank those who took part in the Extraordinary General Assembly and hope to see all EIN members in a full assembly during 2021.

Screen Shot 2020-12-18 at 12.02.01.png

Online Training for Georgian Civil Society about ECtHR judgments implementation process

On the December 17th EIN organised a joint training session for Georgian civil society with the Georgian Young Lawyer’s Association (GYLA). This training session aimed to enhance the capacity of civil society’s engagement with the process of implementation of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

The training session focused on two main areas: the implementation process of judgments of the ECtHR and how to address the issue of non-implementation of ECtHR judgments in Georgia.

Screenshot.png

EIN Director George Stafford and GYLA Strategic Litigation Coordinator Nino Jomarjidze provided the session's introductions. After the welcoming remarks, Veronika Kotek,  representative of the Council of Europe’s Department for the Execution of Judgments (DEJ), provided civil society organisations with an overview of the implementation process in Strasbourg and the mandate of the Council of Europe of the Committee of Ministers. This was followed with a presentation by EIN Programme Manager Agnes Ciccarone, regarding the involvement of NGOs in the Strasbourg system, specifically looking at how NGOs can participate in that process. GYLA Strategic Litigation Coordinator Nino Jomarjidze then gave concrete examples from GYLA’s work, to highlight the importance for NGOs of being involved in the implementation process. The session then moved towards discussing the current ECtHR judgments that are pending against Georgia, with a presentation by the EIN Director George Stafford.

Following the first session, participants joined in a break- out session on writing Rule 9 submissions, moderated by DEJ representative Veronika Kotek and EIN Programme Manager Agnes Ciccarone, and how to work on pending ECtHR cases against Georgia, moderated by GYLA Strategic Litigation Coordinator Nino Jomarjidze and EIN Director George Stafford.

The second session addressed how civil society organizations can become more engaged with the ECtHR implementation process at the national level. Nino Jomarjidze, Strategic Litigation Coordinator at GYLA, presented on the system of supervision of the implementation of ECtHR judgments in the Georgian Parliament. Next, the session moved on to the role of the Public Defender’s Office in ECtHR implementation, which was explained by Tamar Abazadze, Head of the Analytical Department at the PDO. The final topic of the session discussed international examples of domestic advocacy for the implementation of ECtHR judgments, by EIN Law and Advocacy Officer Ioana Iliescu.

The online training session concluded with final questions, discussion, and next steps for participating with the implementation process in Georgia.

We thank all those who were involved in the training sessions and all participants who joined in.

 

Overview of the Committee of Ministers Deputies Human Rights Meeting December 2020

CM-Dec-2017_50244_013.jpg

From December 1st-3rd the Committee of Minister’s Deputies will be examining several cases of the European Court of Human Rights that are still pending implementation– (see the full list here). For these cases, there were many Rule 9 submissions made by EIN members and partners within our network of implementation advocates. Out of the 32 cases that the CM is examining, 16 submissions are the subject of monitoring submissions.

Decisions by the CM related to these cases were released on December 4th, 2020 and their Decisions on all 32 cases can be found here.

AL NASHIRI group v. Poland (Application No. 28761/11)

Last Decision: March 2019 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1369/H46-19

Violation:
Various violations related to the secret detention and "extraordinary rendition” of the applicant. As a result, the applicant was exposed to a serious risk of further ill-treatment and conditions of detention in breach of Article 3 as well as of further secret detention. He faces a risk of capital punishment in a trial before a United States military commission in which, according to the European Court's judgment, evidence obtained under torture might be used. 

Submissions: 

-       Open Society Justice Initiative (23/10/2020)

AL NASHIRI v. Romania (Application No. 33234/12)

Last Decision: March 2019 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1369/H46-22 

Violation:

Various violations related to the secret detention and "extraordinary rendition” of the applicant. As a result, the applicant was exposed to a serious risk of further ill-treatment and conditions of detention in breach of Article 3 as well as of further secret detention. He faces a risk of capital punishment in a trial before a United States military commission in which, according to the European Court's judgment, evidence obtained under torture might be used 

Submissions:

-       Open Society Justice Initiative (20/10/2020)

Cyprus v. Turkey (Application No. 25781/94) & VARNAVA AND OTHERS v. Turkey (Application No. 16064/90+)

Last Decision: December 2019 CM/Del/Dec(2019)1362/H46-30 

Violation:

 Lack of effective investigation into the fate of nine Greek Cypriots who disappeared during the military operations undertaken by Turkey in Cyprus in 1974.

Submissions:

-       Truth Now

D.H. AND OTHERS v. Czech Republic (Application No. 57325/00)

Last Decision: September 2019 CM/Del/Dec(2019)1355/H46-7 

Violation:

 Discrimination in the enjoyment of the applicants’ right to education due to their enrolment to special schools between 1996 and 1999, on account of their Roma origin. 

Submissions:

-       the Forum for Human Rights  (20/10/2020)

-        the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights  (22/10/2020)

GONGADZE v. Ukraine (Application No. 34056/02)

Last Decision: September 2018 CM/Del/Dec(2018)1324/H46-25 

Violation:

 The killing of a journalist and lack of effective investigation. 

Submissions: 

-       the Institute of Mass Information (26/10/2020)

KHAN v. France (Application No. 12267/16)

First examination by the CM 

Violation:

Lack of care and protection of an unaccompanied foreign minor given his living conditions in the Calais “lande” and the non-enforcement of the order of the juvenile judge aimed at protecting him. 

Submissions:

-       Help Refugees, Médecins du Monde Nord Littoral, Project Play, Refugee Rights Europe, Refugee Women’s Centre, Refugee Youth Service, Safe Passage International, Secours Catholique-Caritas France, Utopia 56 (French Only)  (26/10/2020)

-       the French Ombudsman (27 July 2020)

KAVALA v. Turkey (Application No. 28749/18)

Last Decision: 29 September – 1 October 2020 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1383/H46-22

Violation:

 Unjustified and extended detention of the applicant without reasonable suspicion and with the ulterior purpose of reducing him to silence.

Submissions:

-       Human Rights Watch, the International Commission of Jurists, and the Turkey Human Rights Litigation Support Project (02/11/2020)

KHASHIYEV and AKAYEVA group v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57942/00)

Last Decision: March 2018 CM/Del/Dec(2018)1310/H46-16 

Violation:

 The action of the security forces, mostly in the Chechen Republic (the search for missing persons in the cases concerning events which took place between 1999 and 2006).

 Submissions:

-        European Human Rights Advocacy Centre and Memorial Human Rights Centre (21/10/2020)

-       European Human Rights Advocacy Centre and Memorial Human Rights Centre (03/11/2020)

 MAMMADLI group of cases v. Azerbaijan (Application No. 47145/14)

Last Decision: 1-3 September 2020 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1377bis/H46

 Violation:

 Arrest and pre-trial detention to punish the applicants for his activities in the area of electoral monitoring (Mammadli) or for their active social and political engagement (Rashad Hasanov and others) in breach of Article 18 taken in conjunction with Article 5.

 Submissions: 

-       Amnesty International, the Baku Human Rights Club, the Election Monitoring and Democracy Studies Centre, the European Human Rights Advocacy Centre, the European Implementation Network, the Human Rights House Foundation, the International Partnership for Human Rights, the Legal Education Society and the Netherlands Helsinki Committee (22/10/2020)

 McKERR GROUP v. UK (Application no. 28883/95)

Last Decision: 1-3 September 2020 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1377bis/H46-44

Violation:

Actions of security forces in Northern Ireland in the 1980s and 1990s; failure to conduct Article 2-compliant investigations.

 Submissions:

-       Committee on the Administration of Justice (29/10/2020)

 NISIOTIS GROUP v. Greece (Application no. 34704/08)

Last Decision: September 2018 CM/Del/Dec(2018)1324/H46-8

 Violation:

 Prison overcrowding and other poor conditions in prison.

 Submissions:

-        Hellenic League for Human Rights (16/10/2020)

NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine (Application no. 54825/00)

Last Decision: 29 September – 1 October 2020 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1383/H46-25

Violation:

 Poor conditions of detention and lack of adequate medical treatment.

Submissions:

-       European Prison Litigation Network and the Kharkiv Human Right Protection Group (02/11/2020)

OPUZ GROUP v. Turkey (Application no. 33401/02)

Last Decision: December 2018 CM/Del/Dec(2018)1331/H46-29

Violation:

 Failure to provide protection from domestic violence. 

Submissions:

-       Federation of Women Associations of Turkey (22/10/2020)

-       Mor Çatı Women’s Shelter Foundation (23/10/2020)  

TSINTSABADZE GROUP v. Georgia (Application no. 35403/06)

Last Decision: December 2019 CM/Del/Dec(2019)1362/H46-8

Violation:

 Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill-treatment or violations of the right to life; excessive use of force by the police in the course of arrest and/or while detaining suspects.

Submissions:

-        Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association and European Human Rights Advocacy Centre (20/10/2020)

-       Public Defender’s Office of Georgia (23/10/2020)

VOLODINA GROUP v. Russia (Application no. 41261/17)

First examination

Violation:

Failure to protect from domestic violence and to conduct an effective investigation.

Submissions: 

-        Stichting Justice Initiative (31/07/2020)

 YORDANOVA AND OTHERS group of cases v. Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06)

Last Decision March 2020 CM/Del/Dec(2020)1369/H46-9

 Violation:

 Eviction of persons of Roma origin[2] on the basis of legislation not requiring adequate examination of the proportionality of the measure.

 Submissions:

-       Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (03/11/2020)

-       Bulgarian Helsinki Committee (23/10/2020)

-       Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights (16/10/2020)